Leak detection methods
LEAK DETECTION METHODS FOR ONSHORE PIPELINE
Leak detection is used to determine where
a leak has occurred in liquid and gas pipeline systems. Methods of detection
include hydrostatic testing (hydrotest), infrared, and laser technology after
pipeline erection and leak detection during service.
The likely causes of pipeline leakage
Causes of pipeline leakage can be
divided into five main categories:
o
Internal
and external corrosion
o
Third
party damage
o
Operational
error
o
Natural
hazards
o Mechanical failure
Leak detection for the pipeline may be achieved by the
provision of equipment (eg. Pipeline
Integrity Monitoring & Leak Detection Systems (PIMS)) to undertake
constant monitoring of pressure sensing devices located at each end of the
pipeline and at the intermediate isolating valve stations.
The output from these monitoring devices, should be
displayed in the main control room, and thereby enable the operators to
identify abnormal or unexplained deviations in pressure and to shut in the
pipeline section affected by actuating the intermediate/block isolating valves.
In addition to the above, any PIMS/SCADA system,
metering should be installed at each end of the pipeline. The signal from the
meter at the receipt terminal should be transmitted to the main control room
(usually the pumping end of the pipeline) for comparison with the outgoing
meter signal. Any unexplained deviation from a predetermined threshold value
should alert the operators as to a possible leak or malfunction.
Leak detection system may be classified as
a.
Internal-based
leak detection system.
b.
External
–based leak detection system
External
– based leak detection system can detect the smallest leak with high accuracy. Internal-based leak detection discovers gas leakage
based on measurement reading at some specific location along the pipeline. eg. Computational
Pipeline Monitoring (CPM)
The
main aim of leak detection is to help pipeline operators to detect and localize
leaks. The following methods may be used to detect leaks in pipelines.
1.
Water
immersion bubble test method
2.
Soap
solution bubble test
The pressurized unit to be tested is sprayed with a soap
solution and the operator is able to see the bubbles formed by gas escaping
from where the leak is.
3.
Software
based leak detection system
Computational
Pipeline Monitoring (CPM) systems (also called software based leak detection
systems) use pipeline data to infer leaks on the pipeline and/or to alarm upon
hydraulic anomalies that have the characteristics of a leak. These systems are
in place to alert the Pipeline Controller so he/she can evaluate the cause and
as necessary to shut-down the pipeline and minimize the size of a spill.
4.
PIMS/SCADA
– based system
A leak
detection system can be integrated into the SCADA system in the control room.
SCADA systems can alert personnel in the control room whenever there is a leak
as well as record keeping and trending before and after the event. Locating the
leak with a precise location facilitates quicker response and repairs.
5.
Fiber
optic sensing technology
Leaks can cause
sudden temperature changes in the soil surrounding a pipeline. Fiber optic
cables buried along pipelines can sense these temperature changes, as well as
acoustic vibrations from a leaky pipe. Signals are then sent to the control
room and anything out of the ordinary triggers alarms.
6. Detecting leaks through pressure changes
A leakage can cause a noticeable change in gas
pressure. Therefore sensors can be installed to detect changes in the pressure
of the pipeline. Changes in pressure can trigger an alarm. The sensors required
for this technique can be categorized as flow, pressure, and temperature.
7. External Leak Detection
Equipment
External leak
detection equipment can be installed on the pipeline. Detection equipment can
monitor the dynamics of the flow for changes that would indicate a leak.
8.
Intelligent
pigging
Small leaks can
produce ultrasonic signals which can be detected by a pig propelled forward by
oil flow over several seconds, allowing several hundred samples. Very small
leaks can be detected by this method. The disadvantage of this method is
frequent requirement of pigging.
9.
Radioactive
tracing
10.
Acoustic
emission systems
The presence of
a leak is manifested by an increased noise level. The sound generated by leak
can be used as a means of leak detection and location.
11.
Chemical
based systems
12.
Observing
the environment for suspected natural gas pipeline LEAK:
Any one of these is a sign of a suspected natural gas
pipeline LEAK:
a.
Whistling
or hissing sound;
b.
Distinctive,
strong odor, often compared to rotten eggs;
c.
Dense
fog, mist or white cloud;
d.
Bubbling
in water, ponds or creeks;
e.
Dust
or dirt blowing up from the ground; or
f.
Discolored
or dead vegetation above the pipeline right of way.
Table 1: Technical Specification for Onshore Leak Detection System
Minimum Technical
Specification of leak detection equipment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. SYSTEM COMPONENTS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A. Sonic Sensors
·
Mechanically
mounted inside all-weather casing and bolted into the pipeline.
·
Sensor must have
10-30 volt supply powered by remote units
·
Output capacity
4-20mA current signal
·
Two (2) wire
instrumentation cable required for connection between sensor and remote units
·
Indicate distance
between sensors
·
Sensors operate in
the range of 10MHz to 400kHz
·
Sensors shall be
strategically installed at various locations along the pipeline.
·
The distance
between sensors should be varied and factors including the following must be
considered.
o Characteristics of the pipeline
o Fluid
o System performance requirements
o Calculated acoustic signal attenuation in the fluid and
or gas
·
The use of a pair
of sensors at the two ends of the pipeline segment must allow for the identification
and rejection of the external operational noises generated outside the
monitored segment that otherwise would cause false alarms.
·
Sensors to be
installed on the pipeline must be rated to the maximum pressure of the
pipeline and must adopt an installation that avoids or eliminate costly
shutdown.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B. REMOTE TERMINAL
UNITS
·
The field devices
may be dedicated for the application or shared with a DCS (Distributed
Control System) or SCADA system. Selection of either approach will be
determined by the application performance measures. This also may determine
the use of dedicated communication media and operator interface subsystems.
·
Remote terminal
units must be provided and installed in the field and in close proximity to
the sensors.
·
The Remote terminal
units shall be placed in a standard rack mount cabinet located in the
equipment shelter. Each unit must support one pair of sensors, and must
function to conduct a pre-filtering of the data acquired by the sensors and
send them over digital communication to the central monitoring station.
·
The Remote terminal
units should be connected to the Central Monitoring Station via a single or a
combination of media, such as optical fiber, GPRS, radio, satellite, etc.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. CENTRAL MONITORING
STATION
·
The System
configuration and operation must be performed on a dedicated computer running
non-proprietary supervisory software.
·
The System must act
as a Human-Machine Interface (HMI), and features customized pictographic
screens illustrating pipeline aerial views and highlighting the monitored
points and many other vital system parts.
·
The System
configuration parameters and operating conditions must have the capacity to
be inputted into the supervisory software through user friendly engineering
screens.
·
The
System must have the capacity to detect and confirm a leak; an alarm system
should be activated to sound off to show the exact location of a leak with
date and time captured.
·
Ability to
customize an HMI screen in various ways to the Client (if required).
Amongst the main functions and characteristics of the
central monitoring station (CMS) leak detection module are:
o
Carry out complex
multi-layer signal filtering and data processing.
o
Utilize filters
(band pass filters, differential filters, phase filters, floating average
filters, correlative filters, mask filters, neural filters, and adaptive gain
blocks).
o
Compare acquired
signals with embedded masks.
o
Analyze and
evaluate data received from sensors to
validate and confirm an event (leak).
o
Clock synchronized by
satellite among all remote terminal
units in use.
o Utilizes re-programmable leak
masks.
o
Perform internal diagnostic tests and report faults.
The supervisory computer system is responsible for
various informational, communication, security and diagnostic functions. In
addition, it manages and maintains an intricate database and reports as well
as historical event logs.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.
PIPELINE PROTECTION COVERAGE
The offered system must offer 100% pipeline coverage
without any muting or dead zones.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
a. The
leak detector must be fast, simple and straight forward in obtaining data
without having to depend on third party instruments or proprietary software.
b. Ability
to deal with transients conditions without causing spurious alarms.
c. Should
comply with the following standards
·
API RP
1130 - Computational Pipeline Monitoring
·
API 1149 - Pipeline Variable Uncertainties &
their Effect on Leak Detectability
·
ISO 5168 - as part of the sensitivity study
requirements
·
Environmental
Protection Agency
o
EPA530/UST-90/010 - Standard Test Procedure to
Evaluating Pipeline Leak Detection Method: Pipeline Leak Detection System
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A.
Reliability
Pipeline leak detection system must correctly report
any real alarms, and also does not generate false alarms.
Table 2: Minimum levels of reliability for Pipeline Leak
Detection System selection
B.
Accuracy
Accuracy of calculated leak rate = ± 10% of reading
C.
Response time
·
Ability to declare
an alarm in seconds or minutes rather than hours or days
·
Detects a specific
and unique sonic wave which travels from the source of the leaks onset to
strategically laced sensors at the speed of sound.
D.
Robustness
·
The leak detection
system should withstand extreme environmental conditions.
·
Has the ability to
continue to function and provide useful information, even under changing
conditions of pipeline operation, or in conditions where data is temporary
lost or suspected to be lost.
Table 3: Minimum levels of robustness for Pipeline Leak
Detection System selection
E.
Sensitivity
·
The system must
have the capacity to detect leaks of any size within seconds to few minutes
(max) from the time of occurrence of leak.
·
The system
sensitivity must be a variable value, and differs according to pipeline
arrangement.
Table 4: Sensitivity requirement for gas pipeline
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.
LEAK MONITORING PACKAGE – SOFTWARE ENGINE
·
Leak
monitoring software shall provide continuous operator alert and logging
functions for the pipelines including real time simulation capability for
diagnostics
·
Leak
monitoring software shall provide history archive of actual leak detected and
suspected or filtered events.
·
Leak
monitoring software shall provide report to indicate leak details with
capability to print or display on the designated operator workstation. The
system shall report the location of the leak within time fame that does not
exceed twice of the Pipeline Leak Detection time specified in Table 1. The
report may include topographical locations coordinates, etc.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.
TESTING
(1)
Factory
acceptance test (FAT) shall be conducted by a four (4) member team of the
purchaser after contract award, and prior to shipping of the equipment.
(2)
The
tenderer shall include the travel cost of the said team in the total tender
price.
(3) Pre FAT testing should be conducted and proof submitted
thereof by the Supplier before witnessed FAT is arranged.
(4)
Field
test of leak detector shall be provided upon commissioning.
(5)
The
Leak Detection System shall be tested to comply with the followings:
a.
Performance
measures determined by the leak detection (risk assessment) study per
Purchaser Factory Acceptance Test standards
Or,
b.
Approved
international standard procedures (i.e., API, EPA), Proponent test procedures
and requirements.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.
FIELD INSTRUMENTATION
The application and installation of Pipeline Leak
Detection field instrumentation shall meet the reliability and robustness measures
stated above. Conventional instruments such as pressure, temperature, etc.,
shall meet requirements of standards stated in Section 3.c of system
performance above. Other instruments shall be selected based on selected
Pipeline Leak Detection System recommendation.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsea leak detection system
The
offshore leak detection system should satisfy the requirement of ISO 13628-6.
There
are water/oil/liquid leak detection systems available which can be used to
detect oil leakage if the pipeline is transporting liquids
Table 2: Technical Specification for Subsea Leak Detection
System
Leak
Detection Technology
|
Calibration/Recalibration
|
Maintenance
|
Mechanical
Interface
|
Weight
(Kg)
|
Dimensions
|
Connection
To Power And Communication
|
Power
Need
|
Bandwidth
Need
|
Detectable
Release Limit Or Other Accuracy Information
|
Detectable
Media
|
Detection
Range
|
Reliability
Data
|
Design
Life
(Years)
|
Water
Depth (m)
|
Temperature
(°C)
|
Capacitance
|
No recalibration
|
Cleaning using a hydro-jet should be ok
|
Bolted on to cover above leak point
|
<5
|
<1000ccm=1.1
|
4-20mA and CANBus
|
24V, 0.5W
|
Low
|
Even small leaks are detected
|
All hydrocarbons
|
Depending on overall system design
|
Approx. 300 units delivered, no returns
and no reports of failure after installation
|
25
|
4000, deeper if required
|
All sea temperatures OK
|
Fiber optic
|
No calibration
|
2 years
|
System specific
|
20kg-surface equipment
|
56x45x15cms
|
Ethernet at surface
|
240/110v
300w at surface
|
System specific
|
Gas bubble at 1Hz detected. Low pressure
threshold approx. 2bar. No upper limit
|
Not depended on chemical compound,
detects vibrations caused by a leak
|
Dependent on energy, but typically 5m
|
-
|
20
|
4000
|
+5 to +50 (operation)
|
Fluorescent
|
No recalibration required
|
Possible lens cleaning every 3-5 years
|
Bolted on to XT and SPS
|
10-15 in air
|
Ø200x200m,
100x200x200mm
|
4 wire Tronic/ CANbus/ 4-20mA
|
24V, <10W
|
Low
|
Wide dynamic range < 100ppm @ 4m
|
Crude oil production fluids with
fluorescent markers
|
3-5m
|
-
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Optical camera
|
No
|
Check moving parts and lens cleaning
every 2 years. Intervention every 5 years
|
ROV mountable on Xmas tree, no pre
installation required
|
Camera 3.2 in air. Light 4.1 in air
|
Ø100 x 200mm. 880*550*450
|
4 wire tronic. Communication via power
line
|
96W
|
Medium communication on separate line or
via subsea control system
|
-
|
All hydrocarbons and injected chemicals
|
10 meters
|
N/A
|
25
|
1000 made in aluminum 3000 made in
titanium
|
|
Passive acoustic
|
Adapts to background noise at
installation site. No recalibration required
|
None
|
ROV mounting, for larger type of systems
a special cone is required
|
Smaller type 2-3, larger type 250 in air
|
Smaller type Ø 64x 357mm, larger type Ø1
x 1.8m
|
N/A
|
Larger type: 25W
|
Dependent on processing subsea or topside
processing topside requires more band width
|
Smaller type: 5 liter/min @ 25 Bar diff
pressure at 2m distance. Detection range 50m with increased leakage rate.
Larger type: 5liter/min @ 5Bar diff pressure at 5m distance. Detection range
1000m with increased leakage rate.
|
Not important
|
-
|
-
|
5 for small type and 25 for large type
|
2500
|
Operational in sea water: 5 - +30.
Onshore test temperature: – 20 - +70. Storage: – 40 - +70
|
Active acoustic
|
Calibration during sea acceptance test
|
3-5 years interval
|
Mounted on ROV skid or directly to
template structure. Will be designed to be ROV retrievable.
|
Receive array 9.6 (dry), subsea bottle
24.8 (dry), transmit array 4.5 (dry),
|
Receiver: 102 x 496 x 131mm. Transmitter:
240 x 86 x 99mm. subsea bottle: 530.9 x 174mm
|
48V,
Ethernet
|
40W – 100W
|
High development goal is 1 – 10Mbit
Ethernet interface
|
Small gas leakages (0.35mm nozzle, 2bar
pressure difference) detected at about 30 meters. Fluid leak from 5mm nozzle
with 15bar pressure difference detected at 50m.
|
Not dependent on chemical compound as
long as acoustic impedance is different to that of sea water
|
Depends on leak size and media. Small gas
leaks seen up to 125m range. Fluid seen up to 50m range (maximum test range
to date)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
400 and 6000 versions
|
-5 to 40 (operation), -30 to 55 (storage)
|
Calibrates automatically at installation.
No recalibration needed
|
Deepening on water depth from 4-8years
interval.
|
ROV mountable on Xmas tree, no pre
installation required
|
<11kg complete unit (dry)
|
226 x 62 x 154mm
|
15-36V 100Mb/s
Ethernet 16Mb/s
RS-485
|
Type:
15W <30W – dependent on required
updating rate
|
Dependent on requirement and information,
can be low 9600 Baud system specific
|
Angular resolution < 0.75°
Range resolution < 10mm
|
Not dependent on chemical compound as
long as acoustic impedance is different to that of sea water
|
Angle horizontal 90° or 120°. Angle vertical
20°. Range 1 to < 100m
|
N/A
|
25
|
300 or 3000
|
-20 - 60
|
|
Bio sensors
|
Calibration after installation
|
Replacement of biosensor module
|
Installed in a sensor rack integrated or
in proximity of the monitored structure
|
Bio sensor module 2-3 (in air)
|
Prototype racks are 2m x 0.4m x 0.4m
(physical, chemical and biological sensor array)
|
Connected to subsea control system via
cable RS -485 or Ethernet
|
Approx. 10W
|
Low
|
< 0.06ppm on hydrocarbons (raw oil)
|
Not dependent on chemical compound,
specification will depend on selected
biosensor
|
Depending on leak size, media and sea
current (upstream/ downstream approach)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
100(500 from 2012)
|
Ocean temperature range
|
Methane sniffer: semi-conductor
|
2 years
|
2 years
|
Adaptable to fit application
|
0.5kg in water
|
Ø49mm x 200mm
|
Wet mateable plug
|
1W
|
Low
|
Very small leaks
|
Methane
|
Lower range limit 1 nM (oceanic
back-ground)
|
Lifetime 5 years
|
5
|
4000
|
0-30
|
Note:
Subsea = shallow water or deep
water, N/A = Not
Applicable, XT =
Xmas tree, SPS = subsea processing
system, ROV = Remote
Operated Vehicle, CAN bus = controller area network,
|
Leak Detection is the innumerable thing required to protect our space from uncertain situations. This post helps me to choose the best Portable gas detector at the best price.
ReplyDeletethanks Monu...
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGreat blog. I am very happy to read your blog you put every details about it, anyone can know more by reading your blog. If anyone want to know more details about leak detection sensor they can visit: https://iconprocon.com/product/ld-leak-detection-sensor/
ReplyDeleteThank you
Delete